Paul Crossley writes to Inside Housing in response to its article "Green homes will constrain afford

12 January 2010

The point made by King Sturge that financial cuts and tight regulations on green housing will restrict the Government’s ability to deliver affordable housing (Inside Housing Online, 11 January) is absolutely on the mark. Everyone is aware that the initial cost of building sustainable housing is high, which has become an even greater financial challenge following Government funding cuts.

However, I believe we must consider the financial implications of doing nothing. As Lord Stern said, the costs of inaction and its future consequences far outweigh the costs of doing something about it now. If we do not tackle this issue it will only result in an increase in costs for the future. For example, Fuel Poverty – households that spend more than 10 percent of their income on utility bills – will become an increasing financial burden if no efforts are made to reduce domestic energy consumption.

Furthermore, with a focus on the whole lifecycle of buildings, well designed, flexible, and energy and water efficient housing will actually reduce operating costs for residents.

In my view it will be innovative housing associations and developers ahead of legislation who are in a better position to provide the funding solutions to build both affordable and sustainable housing.

Paul Crossley, Sustainability Manager
Robinsons Low Francis